Tables and Figures Contents

Introduction and Methodology

• Table 1: CDP response status of FT500 companies
• Figure 1: CDP response status of FT500 companies
• Table 2: FT500 companies reporting their GHG emissions to CDP5 by region
• Table 3: ECI sectors
• Table 4: Summary reporting practice of total sample
• Figure 2: Summary reporting practice of total sample
• Figure 3: Summary reporting practice in the USA and Canada
• Figure 4: Summary reporting practice in Europe
• Figure 5: Summary reporting practice in Australia and New Zealand
• Figure 6: Summary reporting practice in Emerging markets
• Figure 7: Summary reporting practice in Rest of the world
• Figure 8: Number of companies per sector relative to number reporting absolute emissions

Chapter 1

• Table 5: Summary – key characteristics of main GHG emissions-reporting protocols
• Table 6: Protocols and guidelines used by surveyed companies
• Table 7: Approximate GHG emissions measurement and verification costs
• Table 8: Overall frequency of protocols and guidelines as quoted in CDP5 responses, by region
• Figure 9: Frequency of guidelines by region (excluding the GHG Protocol)
• Figure 10: Frequency of the GHG Protocol, by region
• Table 9: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Aerospace and Defence
• Table 10: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Automobiles and Parts
• Table 11: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Banking and Finance
• Table 12: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Chemicals
• Table 13: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Food and Beverages
• Table 14: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Health and Pharmaceuticals
• Table 15: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Industrials
• Table 16: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Insurance
• Table 17: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Leisure and Media
• Table 18: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Mining and Metals
• Table 19: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Oil and Gas
• Table 20: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Personal and Household Goods
• Table 21: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Real Estate
• Table 22: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Retail
• Table 23: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Support Services
• Table 24: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Technology
• Table 25: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Telecommunications
• Table 26: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Tobacco
• Table 27: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Transport and Logistics
• Table 28: Frequency of standard protocols and guidelines used – Utilities
• Table 29: Summary of verification practice, by region
• Figure 11: Overall summary of verification practice
• Figure 12: Verification practice in USA and Canada
• Figure 13: Verification practice in Europe
• Figure 14: Verification practice in Australia and New Zealand
• Figure 15: Verification practice in Emerging markets
• Figure 16: Verification practice in the Rest of the world
• Figure 17: Verification practice – Frequency of external verifiers used, by region
• Figure 18: Number of companies employing the GHG protocol that use an external verifier
• Table 30: Relative importance of factors in determining the cost of emissions audits, according to auditors
• Table 31: Approximate range of time in weeks required to verify a client’s annual GHG emissions figures, according to auditors

Chapter 2

• Table 32: Companies reporting emissions intensity relative to those reporting absolute emissions, by region
• Figure 19: Total number of companies reporting emissions intensity relative to those reporting absolute emissions
• Table 33: Percentage of companies reporting emissions intensity, by sector
• Table 34: Frequency of emissions-intensity indicators used, by sector
• Figure 20: Overall frequency of emissions-intensity indicators

Chapter 3

• Table 35: Ranking investment criteria for non-carbon-intensive companies
• Table 36: Ranking investment criteria for carbon-intensive companies

Chapter 4

• Figure 21: Total frequency of absolute emissions and emissions-intensity targets
• Figure 22: Summary of target use
• Figure 23: Summary of target use, by region
• Figure 24: Timeframes for absolute-emissions-reduction targets
• Figure 25: Timeframes for emissions-intensity-reduction targets

Appendices

• Emissions-reporting guidelines and protocols quoted and abbreviation used in this report
• Verification agencies mentioned in FT500 companies’ responses to the CDP5 questionnaire
• Emissions intensity indicators used, by sector, including additional detail noted in CDP5 responses
• Absolute emissions and emissions-intensity targets set across industry