As the global financial system buckles, microfinance institutions continue to grow on the back of their record for low risk and solid returns
Microfinance gives small-scale financial services such as loans, savings, insurance and money transfer to poor customers who would otherwise not have access to banking services. Microcredit, an important component of microfinance, involves offering very small loans to poor clients without any collateral and often without any written contract.
First championed by the Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus in Bangladesh, microfinance has gained a reputation for near-zero default rates and a stable rate of return over the long term for investors. These returns are estimated at about 6% a year, with the best-performing funds returning three or four times that amount.
Healthy and stable returns, combined with the feel-good factor of supporting a social cause, mean microfinance is of increasing interest for investors. Microfinance institutions have traditionally relied on clients savings, donors, aid agencies and commercial borrowing for funding. But new sources of funding have emerged in the past two or three years. These include socially responsible investment funds, venture capital funds with a social cause, private equity funds, multinational banks and capital markets, according to the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), a leading advocate of microfinance.
Upcoming Ethical Corporation conferences & events:
Comments:
I worry about this a bit. - Jack Man, 23 Dec 2008
This causes me a little concern. Yunus' Grameen Bank was run as a social enterprise whose central concern was the welfare of the poor. It implemented credit financing because, it was thought, that was better than aid programs for setting up viable, ongoing businesses and organisations. But the prime concern was still the well-being of the borrowers who were organised into local social groups to ensure that they behaved responsibly. I'm a bit concerned that if this is taken over by large, profit-seeking multi-nationals, that the borrowers may not be given the same level of social support and instead just be placed under severe litigious pressure. As we have seen, large banks are quite capable of lending money to people who are unable to repay if it makes the banks' short-term sales figures look good, even though it means trouble later on. The involvement of big banks in microfinance may not be in the interests of the poor nor, in the long term, in the interests of the banks themselves.
Post your comment by using the form below: