
Nothing to do with us
Related articles:
Human impact on the environment may have to be proved in a US court
© Copyright Ethical Corporation 2009
You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from EthicalCorp.com and redistribute by email or post to the web. Please note that your account is for use by the subscriber only. Your login details should not be passed on to others. If you would like to license EC copyrighted content for your company or clients, please contact Andrew Bold on andrew.bold@ethicalcorp.com.
Follow Ethical Corporation on Twitter!
Comments:
Climate change - Md. Shah Alam, 17 Nov 2009
It`s very tragic to the Earth that in Singapore the US Preisdent Barack Obama not make anything new than traditional Us stand on carbon emmisions. If Copenhagen fail to draft a new treaty that will bring most negative effect on climate. so let`s we move for request the leaders to save the Earth to draft new treaty on carbon emmision
USA policy should not be based on United Nations' opinion - Robert Moen, 17 Nov 2009
The United States needs our own objective, transparent 'Climate Truth Commission' to think through global warming. In the EPA's recent report that found that CO2 is a pollutant, over half the cites are to the United Nation's climate study.
For twenty years I believed in man-made global warming theory, but the evidence has changed. We've had ten years of warming then ten years of no warming. I blame my confusion on the United Nations for getting ahead of the facts. When they claimed CO2 drives global warming, they were more concerned about politics and funding than science. Just look at their predictions: UN forecasts for the last 10 years do not fit what actually happened.
-- Robert Moen, www.energyplanUSA.com
US chamber of commerce - martin birley, 17 Nov 2009
how staggeringly horrible this organization must be - and how typical of that culture
Filing a lawsuit against the Chamber of Commerce - Vincent Pawlowski, 17 Nov 2009
I am looking for legal assistance in assembling a lawsuit against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for its participation in denying the costs of climate change.
The major re-insurance companies of the world have made it clear that the costs of climate change will be exhorbitantly higher than the costs of implementing solutions. If actuarial analysis has proven that impeding climate change legislation is irresponsible, it is only logical that those opposing it ought to be held fiscally responsible.
climate change - dana torres, 19 Nov 2009
We should work together to proactively combat some negative things people are saying on the U.S. Chamber’s Facebook page. Regarding some move on attacks, the Chamber HAS represented 3 million over the years but I’m sure there’s just some number miscommunication. We should help out and show support! http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/uschamber?ref=ts
Post your comment by using the form below: